
Editorial Policy
BFC’s editorial policy ensures all content drives corporate Bitcoin adoption while safeguarding neutrality and integrity.
Editorial Policy
Purpose
This policy governs all editorial and promotional content produced or distributed by Bitcoin For Corporations (BFC), including written articles, video features, social posts, newsletters, and thought leadership pieces. It ensures that every piece of content reinforces our mission—advancing corporate Bitcoin adoption—while protecting the strategic neutrality, credibility, and long-term integrity of the BFC platform.
Editorial Principles
Mission-Driven Content Only
All BFC content must serve a clear, strategic purpose: to inform, educate, and support corporate decision-makers exploring or executing a Bitcoin treasury strategy. Content that does not advance this mission falls outside our editorial scope.
No Promotion of Equities, IPOs, or Investment Products
BFC does not promote securities, participate in fundraising campaigns, or publish investment-oriented content. We avoid:
- Stock promotion or IPO marketing
- Token sales or capital raise announcements
- Speculative performance language or investor targeting
BFC content must never be construed as financial advice or as marketing any financial product.
Strategic Relevance as the Editorial Lens
When featuring companies, content must clearly tie to:
- Bitcoin treasury strategy, governance, or capital formation
- Bitcoin KPIs or related metrics
- Accounting, risk management, or structural innovation in Bitcoin capital markets
General business updates (e.g., product launches, partnerships, personnel) are only covered when they directly advance the company’s Bitcoin strategy or represent first-mover or best-in-class execution within the Bitcoin corporate ecosystem.
Performance-Based Visibility Standards
BFC does not reward participation. We reward execution.
Coverage is reserved for companies demonstrating material progress along measurable dimensions of Bitcoin treasury leadership, such as:
- Significant BTC allocation (relative to reserves or market cap)
- Capital structure innovation (e.g., convertibles, BTC-backed bonds)
- BTC-per-share, BTC Yield, or other BTC-native KPIs
- Institutional adoption milestones (e.g., public disclosures, IR impact, first-mover status)
We apply a “signal-over-symbolism” filter to every potential story. Our goal is to elevate strategic clarity—not inflate activity.
Careful Treatment of Fundraising, Listings, and Product Announcements
BFC does not align coverage with capital events. When member companies go public, raise capital, or launch products:
- Coverage is not timed to coincide with fundraising rounds or share sales
- Coverage must be Bitcoin-centric, focusing on how the event supports treasury growth, unlocks new capital for BTC acquisition, or signals institutional commitment to Bitcoin strategy
- We do not publish articles, posts, or newsletters that can be construed as promotional material for securities or investment offerings
BFC exists to highlight what companies are doing with Bitcoin—not to market participation in their corporate events.
Sharing Public-Facing Information with BFC
To preserve the credibility and legal clarity of our platform, we ask all BFC member companies to only share public-facing, finalized information when submitting updates, disclosures, or requests for coverage.
This protects both the company and BFC by ensuring:
➤ Regulatory Confidence: BFC must avoid handling or distributing material non-public information (MNPI) to remain compliant with relevant securities laws and maintain institutional trust.
➤ Narrative Integrity: Premature or speculative updates can dilute BFC’s signal-based approach. Coverage is most effective when aligned with confirmed, strategic developments that reinforce a company’s Bitcoin execution story.
➤ Speed of Amplification: When content is public and fully baked, our editorial team can move swiftly to amplify key announcements—whether via social posts, newsletter mentions, or full-length features.
To help us support your efforts at the highest level, please notify BFC immediately following any public disclosure of a material Bitcoin-related update (e.g., filings, press releases, treasury changes, capital raises). Our team will move quickly to assess coverage opportunities across the BFC network.
Editorial and Production Autonomy
BFC retains full discretion over what is covered, how it’s covered, and when. Member-submitted content and announcements are welcomed, but publication is not guaranteed. Our editorial independence is central to our value as a trusted strategic authority in the Bitcoin capital markets ecosystem.
Tone and Style Guidelines
All BFC content must reflect our positioning as the executive network for Bitcoin strategy:
- Strategic, not sensational
- Insightful, not promotional
- Objective, data-informed, and capital-markets aware
- Designed for C-suite readers, institutional investors, and board-level decision-makers
Examples of Acceptable Content
BFC will publish and amplify content that:
- Introduces or significantly expands a Bitcoin treasury strategy
- Details treasury execution (BTC purchases, issuance strategies, BTC-per-share metrics)
- Offers insight into governance, risk management, or accounting practices related to Bitcoin
- Highlights participation in BFC research, events, or capital introductions
- Surfaces original thought leadership that advances Bitcoin capital allocation strategy
- Demonstrates first-mover activity in sectors or geographies
- Measures and benchmarks corporate Bitcoin performance (BTC Yield, BTC NAV, BTC Efficiency)
Editorial Bottom Line
“If it doesn’t advance the Bitcoin treasury mission, it doesn’t fit.”
We are proud to feature companies that lead in Bitcoin strategy—but we highlight performance, not affiliation.
We ask one clear question of every potential story:
Does this help CFOs, boards, and corporate decision-makers understand how and why to adopt Bitcoin as a treasury asset?
If not, we respectfully decline—and may suggest alternative ways to support the member privately or help them work toward measurable visibility.
Editorial Discretion Remains Final
Even when a topic or announcement aligns with the guidelines outlined above, BFC retains full editorial discretion over whether, when, and how it is covered. This allows us to manage narrative flow, mitigate timing conflicts, and ensure alignment with BFC’s broader strategic priorities.
Visibility is earned—but it is not automatic. Final editorial decisions are made in service of mission consistency, market trust, and member network integrity.